Legal briefs & cease-and-desist letters — create, complete, scale
The lawyer steers, COIA does the work. Unfair-competition and trademark cease-and-desist letters with the right undertaking, the correct costs and all attachments — in a single chat.
In production
work. ERLEDIGT.
A firm that doesn’t treat legal tech as a future project.
With more than 120 lawyers across four locations, SKW Schwarz is one of Germany’s leading independent commercial law firms. In 2018 the firm founded SKW Schwarz @ Tech GmbH as its own legal-tech unit and has since pursued the digitalisation of legal work consistently.
In unfair-competition and trademark law, drafting cease-and-desist letters is core business. Clients report trademark violations and the firm creates the corresponding letters — with the right undertaking, correct cost calculations and all necessary attachments. At SKW Schwarz this is no longer a manual process; it is a collaboration between lawyer and COIA.
Recurring letters, changing details, consistently high standards.
A trademark cease-and-desist letter is not a boilerplate. Every trademark violation has different circumstances: different type of infringement, different infringer, different legal basis. The undertaking must match the concrete violation, the cost calculation must add up, the attachments must be complete. At the same time, the underlying structure is similar across many letters. There are templates, playbooks, proven formulations.
The problem lies in joining them up: how do you combine the concrete information about a new trademark violation — arriving by email from the client, often with documents, screenshots and evidence — with the right templates, rules and calculations? Until now this meant: read the email, extract information, pick the right template, adapt manually, calculate costs, assemble attachments. Repeatable, but time-consuming. And for specialised violation types, sometimes the in-house experience simply isn’t there.
The question was never whether this could be automated. The question was how to automate it without giving up legal control. Because a cease-and-desist letter goes out — bearing the firm’s name.
The lawyer steers. COIA works. Skills define the rules.
The workflow at SKW Schwarz shows how lawyer and AI collaborate in practice. The client sends information about a trademark violation by email — with documents, evidence, screenshots. The lawyer opens COIA, the UNOY chat, and drags the documents into the conversation. They select the right template for the cease-and-desist letter. And COIA creates the finished document: with the right undertaking, the correct costs and the matching attachments.
That sounds simple. The depth lies in the architecture behind it. COIA is not a chatbot that generates text. COIA is a chat that can call, operate and orchestrate workflows. Behind every cease-and-desist letter sit Skills — work instructions that define how COIA works. Which template applies when, how the cost calculation runs, which undertaking belongs to which type of violation, which attachments need to be added. The lawyer has control over these Skills and curates them on the substance.
For specialised violation types — such as particularly complex unfair-competition constellations — additional COIA agents are deployed. These are specialised extensions trained and configured for specific tasks. The lawyer decides when an agent is brought in. Responsibility always stays with the human.
Background: Why the role of lawyers is fundamentally changing right now — and what that means for law firms — we describe in the article “When work reorganises itself”.
Work in — result out
Input
- email Client email with information about the trademark violation
- attach_file Documents, screenshots, evidence as attachments
- drag_indicator Lawyer drags everything into the COIA chat
- checklist Lawyer selects the right template
COIA works
- → Skills read the documents and extract the relevant information
- → Template selection is matched against the type of violation
- → Undertaking is created to fit the concrete violation
- → Cost calculation runs against defined rules
- → Attachments are identified, completed and linked to the letter
- → For specialised cases: an agent takes over sub-tasks
Result
- ✓ Finished cease-and-desist letter on the right legal basis
- ✓ Matching undertaking for the concrete violation
- ✓ Correct cost calculation
- ✓ Complete attachments, correctly linked
- ✓ Lawyer reviews, signs off — the letter goes out
Faster
cease-and-desist letters in minutes instead of hours
More precise
costs, undertaking, attachments — rule-based
Scalable
firm knowledge available as Skills
Controlled
lawyer reviews and signs off
“COIA is not a chatbot. It is the working environment in which our lawyers collaborate with Skills and agents. The result: better letters, faster, with the entire firm’s knowledge running in the background.”
Supervision model
Self
You build your own digital twin that delivers results. Every rule defined by you, every result under your control.
Your digital expert — built by you.
Partner
UNOY's expertise is included. You work together with the system — we set it up, you keep control.
Expert knowledge included — we set it up, you keep control.
Supervised
The entire work is delivered as a finished result — with legal accountability through Skribe Attorneys.
You hand off the case — we deliver the finished result.
Why COIA is more than a chat — and more than a workflow.
The decisive difference lies in the connection. A chat alone can advise, draft and summarise — but it can’t steer workflows, can’t select templates by rules, can’t calculate costs algorithmically. A workflow alone can run through steps — but it is rigid, expects structured input and can’t react to the unexpected.
COIA connects the two. The lawyer works in a natural conversation — drags documents in, gives instructions, asks follow-up questions. But in the background COIA orchestrates the defined workflows: template selection, cost calculation, attachment assembly. The Skills define how COIA works. The agents take over specialised tasks. The lawyer keeps control, without having to execute every step by hand.
That means: work gets done faster, because creation is automated. Work is more precise, because rules and templates set the frame. And firm knowledge scales, because every lawyer reaches for the same Skills — the firm’s collective knowledge, codified in work instructions, available for every case.
What we learned from the project.
First: chat is the right surface for legal work. Lawyers work with language — they formulate, argue, refine. A chat interface fits that way of working, because it joins natural interaction with structured execution. The lawyer doesn’t fill in a form or start a workflow manually. They speak with COIA, and COIA orchestrates.
Second: Skills are the key to quality assurance. The actual intelligence doesn’t sit in the AI — it sits in the Skills, the work instructions that define how COIA handles a specific case. Whoever curates the Skills controls the quality. That doesn’t make the lawyer redundant; it gives them a new role: instead of drafting every letter themselves, they curate the rules under which letters are produced.
Third: agents extend reach without giving up control. Not every trademark violation is the same. For specialised unfair-competition constellations the standard Skills are not enough. COIA agents take over those specialised tasks — but always under the lawyer’s supervision, always within the defined frame. That lets a firm efficiently handle cases that would otherwise only be tractable for the handful of specialists on the team.
Technical deep-dive: how we built it with UNOY
expand_more
COIA chat as the working environment
The lawyer interacts through the COIA chat. Documents are dragged in via drag and drop. COIA recognises the context and activates the relevant Skills.
Skills as work instructions
Each Skill holds the rules for a specific aspect: template selection, cost calculation, undertaking, attachment structure. Skills are curated and evolved by lawyers.
Template selection via workflow
COIA examines the type of violation and proposes the matching cease-and-desist template. The lawyer confirms or corrects the choice in the chat.
Automatic cost calculation
Costs are calculated by rule — amount in dispute, fee schedule, disbursements. No guesswork, no recomputation.
Undertaking matched to the violation
The undertaking is not drafted generically, but tailored to the concrete violation — based on the rules defined in the Skills.
Attachment management and assignment
The documents the client provides are identified as attachments, named correctly and assigned to the letter in the right order.
COIA agents for specialised violations
For complex unfair-competition constellations or unusual trademark cases, specialised agents are activated that hold deeper expertise for those case types.
Workflow orchestration through COIA
COIA calls the defined workflows in the background and coordinates extraction, template selection, calculation and drafting. The lawyer sees a chat — COIA orchestrates the work.
Legal review as the final step
Every cease-and-desist letter is reviewed and approved by the lawyer before it leaves the firm. COIA creates, the human is responsible.
More customer cases
SKW Schwarz — engagement letters
Review engagement letters, manage playbooks, sign off review tasks
Esterer & Ellmauthaler
Onboard clients, prepare contracts, identify urgent cases — with Advocat import
Puttinger.Vogl
3,000 claim filings — structured and verified
Create, complete and scale legal briefs. With UNOY instead of manually.
30 minutes. Your legal workflow. No slide deck.